Online Conversation

20 January 2022, 19.00-20.30

 

Observing Time

An online conversation with Tehching Hsieh, Amelia Groom, and Adrian Heathfield

Tehching Hsieh, One Year Performance 1980–1981. Punching the Time Clock, 1980–1981, installation view No Linear Fucking Time, BAK, basis voor actuele kunst, Utrecht, 2021, photo: Tom Janssen

Join BAK, basis voor actuele kunst, Utrecht online on 20 January 2022 for a conversation with performance artist Tehching Hsieh, currently taking part in BAK’s project No Linear Fucking Time, writer Amelia Groom, and writer and curator Adrian Heathfield. The conversation takes Hsieh’s work as a starting point in addressing  performative time, labor time, gaps, and rhythms of endurance, among other things.

Hsieh’s series of “one year” pieces, including Outdoor Piece (1981–1982), Cage Piece (1978–1979), and Time-Clock Piece (1980–1981), each set up a different set of seemingly impossible time- and situation-based conditions for the artist to follow. Through their unfolding they demonstrate how personal experiences of time are strongly dependent on social and environmental conditions; they also give form to the passing of time through documentation of grueling endurance. Time-Clock Piece, included in No Linear Fucking Time at BAK, is a six-minute video accompanied by a set of instructions that documents the artist’s punching of a time-clock every hour, on the hour, for an entire year. Hsieh described his experience over the year as beyond exhaustion, one of constant anxiety and anticipation. It is hard not to see the prescience in this kind of “time keeping” in terms of present-day globalized labor and logistical dynamics, from Amazon to Foxconn.

Groom writes, in an essay on this work: “while the imposed mechanical structure of clock-time is perversely obeyed across an entire annual cycle, other temporal measures are completely disregarded. Diurnal rhythms of light and dark, as well as the body’s circadian rhythms of healthy sleep patterns, are bypassed. . . . so that Tehching’s performance is one of being always right on time while also becoming totally out of synch with the rest of the world.”

In this online discussion Groom—who is co-editor of the “No Linear Fucking Time” focus of BAK’s digital forum Prospections—and Heathfield—who is a scholar, freethought collective member, and the author of Out of Now: The Lifeworks of Tehching Hsieh (2008)—speak along with Hsieh, incorporating their own scholarship and critical work on linear and nonlinear time in performance, labor, and social life.

No Linear Fucking Time (3 December 2021–30 April 2022) is an exhibition with gatherings, an online publication, and a symposium that unsettle dominant temporalities and model alternate forms of livable time. Read more

Find the recorded program and other contributions to No Linear Fucking Time here on Prospections.

Groom and Heathfield’s writing on Hsieh may be found here and here.

Registration
This conversation takes place online, via Zoom and livestream. Free admission, but please register here to receive the link to the Zoom webinar.

 

 

Suggestions from the archive

Panel Discussion

30 September 2023, 16.30-18.30

To the Other Side of the Concrete Wall

A book launch and panel discussion reflecting on the Jina Uprising, one year after its beginning.

Saturday, 30 September, 2023, 16:30–18:30 hrs at BAK, basis actuele kunst, Utrecht Organized by Jina Collective, a Netherlands-based feminist, leftist, anti-capitalist, anti-sexist, and pro-LQBTQIA+ action group that emerged from the Jina Uprising. This event launches a book of translated essays, co-published with BAK, which include some of the first English translations of texts by journalists […]

Public Program

09 September–29 October 2023

To Watch the War: The Moving Image Amidst the Invasion of Ukraine (2014–2023)/Public Program

To Watch the War: The Moving Image Amidst the Invasion of Ukraine (2014–2023) involves a hybrid off- and online sequence of conversations and screenings around discursive and artistic interventions that reimagine the social implications of watching the war through ways that disrupt, subvert, resist the media’s incessant spectacularization of war.